Urgency Is Not a Culture. It Is a Countdown.
Urgency can move organizations forward for a while. Eventually it becomes the operating model. That’s when trust starts to erode.
This reflection came out of a recent Build Without Chaos conversation with Danny Speros on leadership, hypergrowth, and organizational pressure.
Listen to the full episode:
YouTube
Spotify
—————————————————-
Urgency Is Not a Culture. It Is a Countdown.
I recently sat down with Danny Speros on Build Without Chaos to discuss hypergrowth, urgency culture, leadership under pressure, and what organizations normalize long after it stops working.
What stayed with me most was not the pace. It was the cost.
This reflection came out of that conversation.
Most organizations that break under pressure do not break all at once. There is a slow accumulation of small decisions, each one reasonable in isolation, that eventually adds up to something that cannot be sustained.
I have been inside enough of those environments to recognize the early signs. The all-hands gets longer and more carefully scripted. People stop asking questions in open forums. Managers start hedging. The language around strategy becomes more abstract.
What is actually happening is a gap opening between what the organization is saying about itself and what people are experiencing from where they sit. That gap is where trust erodes.
Danny Speros has operated close to that gap multiple times, at Zenefits through a business model pivot, a CEO change, and an acquisition by TriNet, and now at Automation Anywhere. What he describes is not a cautionary tale. It is a pattern that shows up inside almost every company that grows faster than its internal infrastructure can absorb.
The Projection Problem Is Not What You Think
Every growing company tells a forward-looking story. It has to. The issue is not ambition. The issue is when that story is not connected to anything traceable. When someone two or three levels down cannot draw a credible line between what leadership is saying and what they are actually being asked to do, the narrative stops functioning as motivation and starts functioning as noise.
Speros puts it precisely: there has to be a believable path. Not a perfect one. But one that holds up under scrutiny.
What I have seen, and what he describes, is that companies often build the narrative outward before they have built the connective tissue inward. The people closest to the actual work are usually the first to notice. They do not always say anything, but they notice.
What Urgency Actually Costs
There is a useful timeline embedded in what Speros observed at Zenefits that most operators know intuitively but rarely say plainly.
Three months of sustained high pressure: manageable. Six months to a year: people start to flatten. Two years or more: the ones with options leave. The ones without stay, but they are not the same people they were.
That second group is the quiet risk. Attrition numbers look fine. What is actually happening is that the people who remain are holding on out of caution, not commitment. They are not asking hard questions. They are not pushing back on bad decisions. They are not taking the kinds of risks that move a business forward.
Speros connects this to a shift he started seeing in early 2023, when Silicon Valley Bank collapsed and tech pivoted from growth to profitability. The leverage that employees felt in 2021 and 2022 began to evaporate. What replaced it was a low-grade anxiety that looks like stability but functions like stagnation. Organizations that run on innovation cannot afford that, even when the spreadsheet says everything is fine.
Narrowing Is an Act of Leadership
What actually helped at Zenefits, in the later years before the TriNet acquisition, was not better communication or a reorganization. It was a deliberate narrowing of focus.
Pick one or two company-wide problems that are genuinely broken. Name one forward-looking opportunity worth real energy. Create urgency that has a defined endpoint rather than urgency as a permanent weather condition.
When urgency is attached to something specific and bounded, people can sustain it. When it is the ambient operating mode with no visible resolution, it accumulates in ways that do not show up on any dashboard.
The operational concept Speros reaches for is opportunity cost. If you are doing ten things at full intensity, you are doing none of them as well as they require. The prioritization work is not a soft skill. It is a core function of leadership, and in high-growth environments it is consistently underdone because it requires saying no to things that are genuinely important.
The Management Problem No One Wants to Name
Management in tech is structurally undertrained and then placed inside environments that reward delivery above everything else.
The promotion logic makes sense on paper. Someone is excellent at their job, has decent relationships with peers, gets a team. From that point forward they are expected to both drive results and develop the people under them, often with minimal preparation inside a context that signals, clearly and repeatedly, that the first obligation is the number.
The two-hour conversation about where someone wants to be in three years gets deprioritized. Not because managers are indifferent to their people, but because the incentive systems do not reward it. They reward throughput.
Speros is thinking about whether agentic AI changes this equation, whether it can absorb enough administrative load that managers have actual capacity for the relational work that holds teams together. That is a real design challenge worth taking seriously.
What to Actually Do Inside the Chaos
The practical advice is not complicated, but executing it requires political will that most organizations underestimate.
Make the list of everything competing for attention. Stack rank it. Draw the line at what can actually be done well given available time, money, and people. Then protect a small amount of capacity for learning and development. Not as a perk. As a survival mechanism. Organizations that spend every available hour on the present become less capable of responding to the future, faster than most leaders expect.
If everything is urgent, you are not operating with priorities. You are operating with a list. And a list does not make decisions. It just grows.
Clarity does not emerge naturally in high-growth environments. It has to be built deliberately and defended when the volume gets loud. That is the actual work of leadership. Not the urgency. The resistance to it.
Related:
Build Without Chaos Podcast → Featured Episodes
